What are the general assessment factors used when considering implementation of FPCONs?

• A. Existence, Capability, Intentions, History, Targeting
• B. Threat, Probability, Impact, Readiness
• C. Existence, Capability, History, Readiness, Risk
• D. Existence, Threat, Vulnerability, Risk

Answer: (A)

The main idea is that deciding when to implement or adjust FPCON levels rests on a threat-based assessment using five practical factors. First, existence asks whether there is credible information or indicators that a threat is present. Second, capability considers whether the adversary has the means and resources to carry out harm if they choose to act. Third, intentions look at motive—whether the threat has a reason to act now or in the near term. Fourth, history draws on past behavior and patterns to inform how likely an action is, given what’s been seen before. Fifth, targeting examines who or what would be attacked and where protection efforts should be concentrated.

These elements together help gauge risk and guide decisions about protective measures and the level of alert. Other frameworks mix in generic risk terms like probability and impact or emphasize readiness, but they don’t provide the same focused lens on existence, motive, and targeted risk that directly drive FPCON considerations.